Saturday, September 29, 2012

The Way of the Master Inventor


THE WAY OF THE MASTER INVENTOR

Each year, IBM asks a small group of employees to join the ranks of Master Inventor. To date This elite group of people invents and mentor others to invent. Tracy Staedter chats with Andy Stanford-Clark, one such person.


andy stanford clark
"My best ideas come to me in the shower." 
Andy Stanford-Clark

10:25 AMimtracynotstacy: good morning. i mean, good afternoon. thanks for taking the time to chat
 andysc0: afternoon/morning :-)
 imtracynotstacy: Let's start by talking about your title. You're a master inventor at IBM. How many people have that title at IBM?
10:28 AM andysc0: Each lab (development and research) has its own community of Master Inventors - here at the Hursley development lab here in the UK, we have 29 Master Inventors - people can be nominated once a year, and it's a 3 year term, so you have to be re-nominated after that.. which makes sure we keep on being inventive!
  Across all of IBM, I don't have the total figure.imtracynotstacy: What does it meant to be a master inventor? What is your role?
 andysc0: There are two main parts to being a Master Inventor...
  1) lots of inventions - you have to have at least 12 to be a Master Inventor... I've just filed my 42nd patent at the patent officebut the main part of being a Master Inventor is2) to help other people find the innovation in their work - people often don't realise that the really hard problem they just solved - the clever algorithm they just came up with, etc, has quite possibly never been done before.
  That's really exciting, and you have to learn to recognise that feeling when something like that happens, because you've probably just created something special and new there, which we can examine to see if we need to get patent protection, or if we can harvest the intellectual capital "nugget" to use in other places
10:32 AM so a lot of people come into my office with a half-formed idea -- a germ of an idea -- and they describe it to me on my white board, and we tease out the actual invention that's lurking in there.
10:33 AM That's the great part about being a Master Inventor -- helping people find their inventions
 imtracynotstacy: can you give me an example of an invention that you helped teased out?
10:35 AM andysc0: usually they're pretty obscure things -- like a new way to manage message objects in a queue inside the engine of one of our messaging products, so one example was a new way to hold on to data that may be needed in the future, but to keep a limited "history" of it, so you could just go back and look for a short window of time
  Most of the inventions are quite obscure; it's rare that we get one like "the wheel" or something fundamental like that :-)imtracynotstacy: :)
  When did you realize you were an "inventor?"
  Fundamentally
10:37 AM andysc0: I think it was when I was a child... I was always building things out of wood and cardboard and then I got into electronics and built gadgets, simple things, like a buzzer to tell my Mum when it was raining outside, so she could go and get the washing in!
10:38 AM When I came to IBM (18 years ago), my first mentor was a very keen inventor at IBM -- one of our first Master Inventors -- and he showed me by example what the invention process was all about at IBM. It's quite a complicated process, as we do lots of checks through peer review, to make sure what we're patenting is of high quality.imtracynotstacy: What inventions are you most proud of? Or are your personal favorites?
10:41 AM andysc0: One I'm most proud of is a technique for Internet load balancing, which I invented while I was working on the web site for a major sporting event in 1996... it allowed us to take web traffic and spread it across web servers in data centers in different locations in the world.
  That invention enabled us to handle the (for then!) huge traffic we were experiencing during the event
10:42 AM I could see my invention making a real difference!
 imtracynotstacy: Are most of your inventions computer or internet related?
10:44 AM andysc0: yes, almost all of them, mostly to do with the internals of our messaging middleware products - often to improve performance of some little corner of the system, which brings great benefits to our Clients when they use it
 imtracynotstacy: Are there inventions that other people have made (at IBM or elsewhere in the world or in time) that you are truly amazed by?
10:45 AM andysc0: Oh yes - lots of them! The Scanning Tunneling Microscope was a great invention by two IBMers -- it won them a Nobel Prize in Physics :-)imtracynotstacy: If someone was hoping to become a master inventor, what personality characteristics are important and why?
10:49 AM andysc0: The main thing is that they are approachable
  we don't want Master Inventors who just sit in a corner and crank out inventions... we need people like that to invent all the cool new technology, of course, but those people don't typically become Master Inventors
10:50 AM It's important not be judgmental of ideas which turn out not to be novel, that can be a real disappointment to our inventors. So an open mind and plenty of encouragement are essential!imtracynotstacy: Is there a time of day or a place where you feel the most inspired? Or that you come up with your best ideas?
10:54 AM andysc0: Here at Hursley Park we have a great environment which is very conducive to innovation 
there are lovely walks in the countryside round about, which are a great way to change gear and let the ideas flow!
10:55 AM I find that chatting with colleagues from other departments or other parts of the business is great for cross-fertilization of ideas, so having a coffee with friends can often lead to new ideas. We once hatched two new inventions before 9 a.m. one day!
10:56 AM My best ideas, however, come to me in the shower... I'm not sure if it's the partial sensory deprivation, or just because my mind is clear of the business of the day, but quite often the most inspired solutions to problems pop into my head there!
 imtracynotstacy: Me too!
  And when I go for a big walk!
 andysc0: I think everyone has a favorite place to think, and it's important for people to find that place.
  There you go :-)
 imtracynotstacy: I know time is short so just a couple more questions.
  What is the most unusual thing on your desk?
10:57 AM andysc0: ok - thanks
  <looking around>
  a wireless light switchimtracynotstacy: you mean like a remote control for light?
 andysc0: it looks like a wall light switch.. well, it *is*,but it has no wires coming out of it. It has a little radio transmitter inside, so when I click it when I'm in my house, the light comes on in the room I'm in !
  How cool is that :-)
10:59 AM And the other cool thing on my desk, is the keyboard I'm typing on.. it has no key caps at all; it's completely black (apart from the caps lock light!)
  that's a sign of a true geek!
  who needs key caps - we know where the letters are!
  OK - I have to go very very very soon
 imtracynotstacy: OKay. Last question. Do you listen to music at work or in your lab and if so, what do you listen to?
11:00 AM andysc0: no.. I prefer quiet. I used to, when I worked in an open plan lab, and then I listened to lots of Irish Folk type music - Enya, that kind of thing - I find it relaxing and doesn't intrude on my thoughts!
 imtracynotstacy: very nice
 andysc0: thanks :-)
 imtracynotstacy: okay I'll let you go
  thanks for your time
 andysc0: ok - thanks - great talking to you

Mystery Robot Revealed: Luna, the Fully Programmable Adult-Size Personal Robot


The company wants the robot to be analogous to computers and smartphones, where software developers design apps that make the devices more and more useful over time.

THE GIST
  • A personal robot designed for people to use at home will begin shipping later this year.
  • The company believes that a well-designed, open and affordable personal robot will kickstart a rush of innovation.
luna
RoboDynamics CEO Fred Nikgohar wants Luna to do for robotics what smartphones did for mobile computing. Click to enlarge this image. 
RoboDynamics, SchultzeWORKS designstudio


























That mystery robot that we've been teased about for months now, originally rumored to be something developed by either Apple or Google, is in fact a project by a company called RoboDynamics. It's called Luna, it's a personal robot designed for people to use at home, it's fully programmable, and will start shipping later this year.
As of right now, the embargo has been lifted and we're allowed to tell you more about Luna and how RoboDynamics, in Santa Monica, Calif., hopes that it'll revolutionize robotics in the same way that the PC revolutionized computing and the iPhone and Android are revolutionizing mobile electronics.
Before we get to the overall concept, here's a rundown of Luna's hardware and software specs, which RoboDynamics says is subject to change:
Computer
--Processor: Dual Core Atom 2 GHz
--Graphics: nVidia 94000M
--Storage capacity: 8 GB Flash, expandable to 32 GB
--Wireless: Wi-Fi (802.11g), optional Bluetooth via Luna Expansion Port (LXP)
--Cellular comm.: Optional 3G or 4G via Luna Expansion Port (LXP)
--Operating system: LunaOS (includes Poky Linux, ROS, and other packages)
I/O--Display: 8" touchscreen capacitive LCD
--Camera: 8-megapixel primary camera with digital zoom
--Microphone: 3 microphone array with DSP front-end with sound localization
--Speakers: Yes (no specs available yet)
--Sensors: 10-bit wheel encoders, PrimeSense 3D Sensor
--Expansion ports: Luna Expansion Ports (LXP) x 7 [Each LXP comprises standard USB Female Type A and 12 volt and 5 volt regulated power with mounting holes] 
Power--Battery: 12 volt, 26 amp-hour - SLA
--Battery life: Between 4-8 hours
--Charge time: 4-8 hours for full charge
Dimensions--Size: Height: 5'2" (157 cm) - Base: 22" (56 cm)
--Weight: 65 lbs (30 Kg)
Clearly, this is not some kind of fancy, futuristic new platform. It's got a pretty good computer in it, with a pretty good graphics card. It's got some pretty good sensors, pretty good mobility and pretty good design. All very pretty good. So why get excited?
Because, at least in principle, Luna could do something that no other robot has been able to accomplish: bring a programmable, general-purpose robot to a vast number of home users and establish an ecosystem for developers to create and sell software that gives the robot more capabilities.
Let's use the computer as an analogy. Starting with the Apple II (or thereabouts, our memory only goes back so far), it was possible to buy a computer system that would come out of the box offering immediate usefulness without requiring specialized technical knowledge. And that's what made everybody want a computer: it would immediately make your life better, and furthermore, the ability to teach it new things makes it increasingly useful.
To take the analogy further, and to get closer to the idea behind Luna, think about the iPhone. You buy it because it makes phone calls and you can get the Internet on it, but that's just the beginning. What makes the iPhone (and Android platforms) stand out from other phones is the fact that you can make it increasingly useful, thanks to the app store. And not just that, but making the iPhone useful by writing apps has become lucrative, which makes the iPhone itself more lucrative, and so on.
RoboDynamics CEO Fred Nikgohar wants Luna to do for robotics what smartphones did for mobile computing. He argues that the robotics industry has failed to make home robots (beyond toys, kits, and vacuum cleaners) available to consumers, and that even open-source software platforms like Willow Garage's ROS are still too hard for people without a PhD in robotics. He hopes that "a well-designed, open and affordable personal robot will kickstart a rush of innovation."
We applaud the idea, but we see some hurdles along the way. RoboDynamics had mentioned previously a price tag of around U.S. $1,000, which would make Luna a very competitive offering. To put that in perspective, remember that a TurtleBot or a Bilibot will set you back $1,200. And they're not five feet tall with touchscreens. But now RoboDynamics is saying that the $1,000 is a target price and that the initial model, to ship later this year, will sell for $3,000.
It's still reasonable for the hardware you're getting, but way above the psychologically appealing price point of $1,000, which would certainly entice a lot of people. So whether RoboDynamics will be able to bring the cost down is still uncertain.
Another issue is software. We haven't had a chance to check out the robot's Linux-based operating system, called LunaOS, and we haven't seen Luna's interface system, the SDK, and the Luna App Store that RoboDynamics says will be available. Software, perhaps even more than hardware, will be key to Luna's success. If the robot ships with good apps, and more apps start to show up on the store, Luna's appeal increases dramatically. But so far this is all a big question mark.
In the next few weeks, RoboDynamics plans to release more information about Luna's first edition, as well as future models, prices, and availability (if you're interested, go to their website and fill out the form). We'll report back as soon as we have a chance to meet the robot in person and check out its full capabilities.

'Air' Batteries Could Energize EVs


THE GIST
  • A critical technique has been developed that allows lithium-air batteries to be recharged many times.
  • Lithium-air batteries promise three to five times as much energy as lithium-ion.
  • Such a battery would allow a person to talk for a week without charging a cellphone or drive 500 miles in a Chevy Volt.
battery charging
Scientists are pushing to improve charging capabilities of lithium air batteries because they use cheap and lightweight oxygen to generate energy. 
artpartner-images 
  benign gas could be the most powerful thing yet tapped to energize your electronic devices: Air. Researchers in the UK say they have made a key step in development of a lithium-air battery, a device that promises three to five times as much energy per unit mass as the existing lithium-ion batteries that we use in our consumer devices and electric vehicles.
Once built, such a battery could allow you to fly cross-country flights with a functioning laptop, or talk for a week without charging your cellphone or even a take a 500-mile journey in a Chevy Volt, for example, instead of the 100 miles it runs today.
The experiment by Peter G. Bruce, professor of chemistry at the University of St. Andrew’s in Scotland, and colleagues was published today in online journal Science Express. It describes a chemical reaction that allows the battery to be recharged without degradation of the battery’s electrode.
"We have demonstrated that sustainable cycling is possible,” said Bruce. “That is the real step here. We haven’t solved all the practical problems and it’s not a solution, but it does demonstrate this critical reaction can be sustained and cycled.”
Scientists are pushing to develop a lithium air battery because they use air as the cathode and lithium metal as the anode. Oxygen is both cheap and light. It doesn’t require the battery to be built with heavy casing to contain the electrodes. In existing batteries, lithium ions move from the cathode to the anode through an electrolyte, or a chemical solution. When you use the battery, the process is reversed and the flow of ions produce an electric current.
In a lithium-air battery, oxygen enters the cathode and combines with lithium ions to produce lithium peroxide, which accumulates as the battery is discharged. The Scottish team was able to produce this chemical reaction over and over again without decomposition, Bruce said, using a thin film of porous gold as an electrode.
That may be the battery’s Achilles heel, says Steve Visco, president and CEO of Polyplus, a Berkeley, Calif., based firm that is building advanced lithium-sulfur, lithium-seawater and lithium-air batteries.
Bruce “is the first to get reversible cycling, which is exciting,” Visco said. “Hopefully it’s not only gold that does it, which would not be practical unless you are sending it into space where cost doesn’t matter. It certainly wouldn’t work for electric vehicles.”
Bruce said that his experiment is one of many that have to be successful before this Holy Grail of advanced battery technology is built.
“It’s still a long way off,” Bruce said. “What we’ve done demonstrates the importance of basic scientific studies in this area. If you rush out and try to make a battery in with knowledge that currently existed you would be unlikely to succeed.”